Posted by
Nerdus Maximus on Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:49:12 AM
There
have been some questions as to whether Eliot Spitzer, and now
apparently his replacement, may have used campaign funds to finance
trysts with volunteer or professional sex partners. This is a fully
understandable confusion of donor intent on the part of the politician.
After all, there is only one letter difference between a donor
intending to support his election and his e(r)ection.